Renowned Indonesian General Prabowo Subianto’s departure from his homeland has sparked a wave of speculation and intrigue, with the hashtag #KaburAjaDulu trending across social media platforms. However, there is a deeper story behind his decision to flee the country. Soemitro Djojohadikusumo, Prabowo’s father, shed light on the reasons behind his son’s exodus in 2000, just before Prabowo was set to testify about his alleged involvement in the May 1998 riots.
During a meeting with the Central Board of the Indonesian Economists Association (ISEI) at his residence in South Jakarta, Soemitro, affectionately known as Pak Cum, revealed that Prabowo was preparing to testify and disclose his version of the events surrounding the past riots. This testimony was a crucial step for Prabowo to clear his name from being constantly scapegoated for any security instability issues in Indonesia. Soemitro expressed his hope that the false accusations against his son would be dispelled, allowing Prabowo to live peacefully and settle back in Indonesia.
In a candid statement, Soemitro emphasized that Prabowo’s departure was ultimately a strategic move to avoid being unfairly targeted as a scapegoat yet again. Remaining in Indonesia would have only led to further baseless accusations being hurled at him, tying him to various unrest incidents across the country. Soemitro’s heartfelt concern for his son’s well-being and reputation shone through his words, illustrating the personal toll this situation had taken on their family.
### A New Chapter Abroad
Despite Prabowo’s strong desire to permanently reside in Indonesia, his plans for returning home were put on hold as he embarked on a new chapter overseas. Nearly two years had passed since Prabowo first left the country, with Jordan being his initial destination. Alongside his new role as an entrepreneur, Prabowo ventured across the Middle East, America, Singapore, Thailand, and several European countries, immersing himself in diverse cultures and experiences.
Soemitro delved into the underlying reasons for Prabowo’s international journey, citing his son’s continuous marginalization and association with contentious cases such as the abduction of activists and the May 1998 riots. These allegations were underscored by the findings of the Joint Fact-Finding Team established by the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM). Despite the swirling rumors and accusations, Soemitro expressed unwavering pride in his son, lauding Prabowo for his rare sense of accountability and integrity as a military figure.
### A Father’s Pride
In a poignant reflection on Prabowo’s character, Soemitro commended his son for upholding honesty and chivalry despite facing a barrage of false accusations. Highlighting Prabowo’s courage to take responsibility for his actions, Soemitro contrasted this trait with the tendency of other generals to shift blame onto their subordinates. This stark difference in leadership style underscored Prabowo’s unique approach to accountability and honor, leaving a lasting impression on those who knew him.
Moreover, Soemitro disclosed that Prabowo made occasional visits back to Indonesia, with his most recent trip occurring shortly before Soemitro’s statement at their home. These homecomings were bittersweet moments of connection with his family and homeland, showcasing Prabowo’s enduring ties to Indonesia despite his prolonged absence. The intricate balance between duty, reputation, and personal values that Prabowo navigated throughout his international ventures painted a complex portrait of a military leader grappling with external pressures and internal integrity.
As the echoes of Soemitro’s words faded, a poignant sense of familial pride and resilience lingered in the air, underscoring the human story behind Prabowo’s enigmatic departure and the unwavering support of a father standing by his son’s side. The intricate web of personal sacrifices, professional challenges, and ethical dilemmas woven into Prabowo’s narrative revealed a multifaceted individual navigating the turbulent waters of reputation and redemption in the public eye.
